Under Trump’s leadership, the Abraham Accords were brokered, fostering peaceful relations between Israel and several Arab countries. Supporters might argue that Trump’s diplomacy prioritized peace and stability in the Middle East, reducing the likelihood of large-scale conflicts like genocide.

Trump had a strong influence on Israel’s actions, often leveraging U.S. aid to assert pressure. Supporters might argue that Trump could use his influence to push for restraint in Gaza, as he did when encouraging Israel to delay or reconsider certain military actions during his presidency.

Although Trump’s policies were pro-Israel, he expressed skepticism about perpetual military occupations. His administration’s calls for reducing America’s military involvement abroad might extend to advocating for de-escalation in Gaza, preventing genocidal violence.

Trump positioned himself as a dealmaker, seeking to broker negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians. Supporters could claim that his focus on negotiating peace rather than perpetuating conflict might prevent an escalation to genocide in Gaza.

Trump took a hard stance on extremist groups in the region, which supporters might argue helped reduce the conditions for widespread violence, focusing on containing terrorism without targeting civilian populations.